<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.23hq.com/resources/um/rsstohtml.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:fh="http://purl.org/syndication/history/1.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Messages in 900px</title>
        <link>https://www.23hq.com/photogroup/suggestions/</link>
        <description>How to make 23 better? Post and discuss ideas here.</description>
        <author></author>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <generator>23people</generator>
        <atom:icon>http://www.23hq.com/resources/um-style/logo-20.gif</atom:icon>
        <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
        <source>https://www.23hq.com/rss/photogroup/suggestions/conversation/7019138</source>
        <link rel="self" href="https://www.23hq.com/rss/photogroup/suggestions/conversation/7019138"/>
        <fh:incremental>false</fh:incremental>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Th Clvr Mnky</title>
            <link>https://www.23hq.com/photogroup/suggestions/conversation/7019138</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; 900px &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Make it smart enough to fall back to 750px based on browser/cookie info (which is, admittedly, error-prone) or 23 will look terrible on all those tablets and netbooks out there.</description>
            <guid>https://www.23hq.com/photogroup/suggestions/conversation/7019138</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:26:10 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Perkin-warbeck</title>
            <link>https://www.23hq.com/photogroup/suggestions/conversation/7019138</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; 900px &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;It has a lot of features suggested in this discussion&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/help/conversation/6827879"&gt;http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/help/conversation/6827879&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0px;"&gt;especially with respect to voting and curating photos.  I find the navigation much less intuitive than 23hq, although I probably didn't spend enough time playing with it.  I really like the 23hq user interface.  Indeed, 900px looks nicer than 756px.</description>
            <guid>https://www.23hq.com/photogroup/suggestions/conversation/7019138</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 01:00:10 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Edouard  de Castro</title>
            <link>https://www.23hq.com/photogroup/suggestions/conversation/7019138</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt;900px&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've seen on (now "trendy") www.500px.com photo portfolio site that they are showing pictures with a max of 900px (for their longest dimension = up to 900x900); 'looks nice/impressive! Couldn't you do that too? (instead of your 756px).&lt;br /&gt;
900px (wide) is nice as it's big but fits - with room for an additional 124 pixels for navigation - even a small 1024px by x screen.</description>
            <guid>https://www.23hq.com/photogroup/suggestions/conversation/7019138</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:02:23 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
