<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.23hq.com/resources/um/rsstohtml.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:fh="http://purl.org/syndication/history/1.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Messages in Feedback &amp; Bugs</title>
        <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/</link>
        <description>... for anyone who wants to give the photogroups feature a spin</description>
        <author></author>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <generator>23people</generator>
        <atom:icon>http://www.23hq.com/resources/um-style/logo-20.gif</atom:icon>
        <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
        <source>http://www.23hq.com/rss/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</source>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.23hq.com/rss/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548"/>
        <fh:incremental>false</fh:incremental>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Steffen Tiedemann Christensen</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's absolutely nothing wrong with Danish imperialism.</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:38:46 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Vincent</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's easier to catch when you don't speak Danish ;)</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:37:12 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Steffen Tiedemann Christensen</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice catch, Vincent.. It's been changed...</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:33:13 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Vincent</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;When searching for a photogroup, it says: Søger...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0px;"&gt;My language is set to English, so I suppose this is a bug :P</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:05:11 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Steffen Tiedemann Christensen</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0px;"&gt;I'm gonna chime in here. I agree with both of the points of view: Yes, do the polite thing if at all possible. And yes, we need to let admins remove photos from a group. It's on the to do list, but it probably won't be ready for another week or two.</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 15:15:45 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from chico75</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;i agree with you. it is more polite to write something to the photo owner. but what is a group gets realy big ? and you have 10 of these photos a day ? and if you have more than one of these groups ? i have other things to do than to write such requests every day. for me it would be nice to have a delete button / link and the optional posibility to write a short message.</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 14:58:05 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Fenja</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would not be nice to remove a picture without notice. A polite request should do it. But there is a point. If someone floods a group with lots of equal looking or of topic pictures a group owner should be able to remove photos.</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 12:14:40 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from chico75</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;one or two times i can make a request. but if you have more groups it takes to long. it would be better just to have a button or link to remove one picture.</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 09:13:36 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from bushgirl</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chico, why not make a polite request to the photo's author to remove it from the group?</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 05:02:22 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from chico75</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;could it be that there ist no possibility to remove photos from a group if they don't fit the topic of the group ?</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 11:13:36 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Philipp Mertens</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;was only one idea that came to my mind</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 11:11:27 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from OldDragon</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like it the way it is. I prefer to choose for myself which groups my photos appear in.</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 11:02:57 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Steffen Tiedemann Christensen</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, public is public, sure. But it might not be transparent for a person who didn't post the photo to the group that private is no longer private. Also, the user need to be a member of the given group, which introduces extra difficulty.</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:51:02 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Philipp Mertens</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;I see! perhaps only the "Public photo"'s.&lt;br /&gt;
or is public not public?</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:48:02 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Steffen Tiedemann Christensen</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;@mertens: Because adding a photo to a group potentially changes the permissions on the photo.</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:39:06 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Philipp Mertens</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;you can tag the photos of other users,&lt;br /&gt;
why you can't post photos of other users to a group?</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:37:37 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from cosmonautirussi</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great Steffen! :)</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 15:03:45 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Steffen Tiedemann Christensen</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;cosmonautirussi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0px;"&gt;I've added a list of new photogroups to the PG front page.</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:58:41 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from cosmonautirussi</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would like to suggest a feature where new groups can be found. "Newest public groups". Is there a thread or a place where a promotion for new groups does make sense?</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:26:44 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from John Grey</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's not really the upload, its the way the smaller versions are generated. I don't think the original should be changed at all. I just think a little more sharpening is needed for the down sized images.&lt;br /&gt;
(thanks Steffen, I've added my thoughts to the thread above)</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:48:15 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from PimpDaddy</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;I never really thought about this until John wrote that post. That's why pictures at Fli**r looks somewhat more sharp maybe? I always wondered how that could be, never thinking that it could be the upload service itself could have an effect on this. I too wote for a bit more sharpening :)</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:37:33 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Steffen Tiedemann Christensen</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey John,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0px;"&gt;There are different opinions about this stuff -- it's been discussed a while back here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.23hq.com/forums/message-view?message_id=514773"&gt;http://www.23hq.com/forums/message-view?message_id=514773&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I'm unsure about the actual conclusion of the discussion though...</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:07:38 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from John Grey</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just wondered if your resizing process sharpened images. Other sites I have used seemed to sharpen too much, but here resized images seem a bit soft.&lt;br /&gt;
Would a *little* more sharpening be better?</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Steffen Tiedemann Christensen</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dates have been added...</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:43:34 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Deeva</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;YES, exactly... how about a date/timestamp on conversations/posts? That would so rule... this site is extremely promising! Great work guys!</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 18:16:33 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from uaeee</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can't see any photos in (Photos) section&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;_&amp;lt;&lt;br /&gt;
and there is no Date/Time Stamp in Conversations</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 07:07:12 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Steffen Tiedemann Christensen</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's still no link directory -- the photogroup feature is still is a sort of pre-beta so it'll still be a week or two before the directory is available.</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 16:55:02 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from zbrox</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Feedback &amp; Bugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, there's no real way of finding new photogroups, or at least I haven't found any. When I open the main photogroup page, there are my groups listed and the ones that are popular. How about the ones that are not popular? Maybe some search by tags, description, or something like that... Just a suggestion...</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 17:45:49 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Jim</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;I tested the "textbox too wide in 'post your reply'..." issue on another box running IE 6. The problem still exists. And it only happens in "Photogroup", not in other part of 23 like comments or discussion.</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:34:52 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Steffen Tiedemann Christensen</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wow, we've really gone beta testing crazy ;-)&lt;br /&gt;
About the first one, that's not a photogroup reg mail -- that's a site-wide mail telling you that a new user has registered at 23.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0px;"&gt;The second issues has been fixed, but requires some downtime to effectuate, so it's pending at the moment.</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/beta/conversation/611548</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:27:26 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
