<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.23hq.com/resources/um/rsstohtml.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:fh="http://purl.org/syndication/history/1.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Messages in Any reviews of the Nikon and Sigma 105mm macro?</title>
        <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/Macro/</link>
        <description>The place to share your macro photography</description>
        <author></author>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <generator>23people</generator>
        <atom:icon>http://www.23hq.com/resources/um-style/logo-20.gif</atom:icon>
        <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
        <source>http://www.23hq.com/rss/photogroup/Macro/conversation/3432060</source>
        <link rel="self" href="http://www.23hq.com/rss/photogroup/Macro/conversation/3432060"/>
        <fh:incremental>false</fh:incremental>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Skor</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/Macro/conversation/3432060</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Any reviews of the Nikon and Sigma 105mm macro? &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hi.&lt;br /&gt;
I can not good speak english :(&lt;br /&gt;
I have the Nikon D40 too and i have the "AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED". Its a very good objectiv! ....but very high in price.</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/Macro/conversation/3432060</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 11:43:50 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from clvrmnky</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/Macro/conversation/3432060</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Any reviews of the Nikon and Sigma 105mm macro? &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Nikkor 105 is razor-sharp, and has such a short DOF that you might need to stop it down quite a bit (which is sort of nice in a macro lens).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0px;"&gt;One thing to check is if the Sigma has been "chipped" for your camera.  If you buy it new this should not be a problem, but if it was made before the D40 was released it might need to be serviced in order for it to work.  This is a general issue with all third-party lenses on Nikon equipment.</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/Macro/conversation/3432060</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:31:04 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from alopecosa</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/Macro/conversation/3432060</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt; Any reviews of the Nikon and Sigma 105mm macro? &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Both of them are excellent. I have an old Sigma 105mm and it works fine with my D70s. Have a look at &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests"&gt;http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests&lt;/a&gt; for details. I think. in terms of price the Sigma is a good choice.</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/Macro/conversation/3432060</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:12:52 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Message from Ulrik Kold</title>
            <link>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/Macro/conversation/3432060</link>
            <description>&lt;b&gt;Any reviews of the Nikon and Sigma 105mm macro?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm considering buying either one of these two lenses, but I just wanted to know if anyone here have any words for or against them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have a Nikon D40 camera right now with a standard 18-55 lens.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0px;"&gt;Thanks in advance!</description>
            <guid>http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/Macro/conversation/3432060</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:29:54 GMT</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="" type="" length=""/>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
